Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 P2D 717 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1989

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

401956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 Okla. Crim. 362 - Sturgis v. State · State v. Phillips · 95 Okla. Crim. 396 - Campbell v. State · 21 Okla. Crim. 298 - Vann v. State · 82 Okla. Crim. 112 - State v. Tyler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Court of Criminal Appeals will not reverse conviction on ground of insufficiency of evidence, unless court can say, after study of all evidence, that there was no substantial evidence in record on which verdict could be based.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In considering the sufficiency of the evidence, the function of this court is limited to ascertaining whether there is a basis in the evidence on which the jury could reasonably conclude that the accused is guilty as charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““This court has been liberal in construing indictments and informations, and has often held that they were sufficient if the offense is charged in the language of the statute. This is especially true in misdemeanor cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.