Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 SO2D 102 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2007

16 state decisions

801974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 285 So. 2d 409 - State Ex Rel. Scaldeferri v. Sandstrom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... The salutary purpose of the constitutional provision is to insure that improper or misconceived remedies which have been sought will not justify dismissal of causes or reviews where a proper remedy or review procedure is available, provided the review sought was timely brought." State v. Johnson, 306 So.2d 102 (Fla. 1974).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The supreme court shall adopt ... a requirement that no cause shall be dismissed because an improper remedy has been sought,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.