Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 SW2D 75 - Mitchell v. McClelland

Mitchell v. McClelland’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1980

9 state decisions

501957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Castorina v. Herrmann · Conrad v. Diehl. · Branner v. Klaber · Basman v. Frank · Deacon v. City of Ladue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The nature of review in equity cases has historically demanded that due deference be given to the findings and conclusions of the trial chancellor, and that this rule of deference not be ignored”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.