Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 SW2D 767 - Booker v. Baker

Booker v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2000 · most notably Texas Power & Light Company v. Cole (1958), Huckaby v. A.G. Perry & Son, Inc. (2000)

5 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

140195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrin · 92 Cal. App. 52 - Vedder v. Bireley · Gendron v. Glidden · Smith v. Clark · Wilkinson v. Marcellus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion Article 6701d, sec. 68a and sec. 72, come within the class of statutes in which the common-law standard of the reasonably prudent man must be-used in determining as a matter of fact, not as a matter of law, whether the conduct of a motorist is negligent. The duties imposed by these-particular statutes are not. absolute, they are conditional. They do not dispense with the necessity of a finding of fact. as- to whether the conduct of a motorist was negligent under the circumstances.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not agree with appellants that the jury's answers to issue A amounted to a finding that Mrs. Baker had violated the named statute, or that she was for that reason guilty of negligence per se.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.