Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 306 SW3D 484 - Commonwealth v. Alleman

Commonwealth v. Alleman’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Black v. Romano · United States v. Copley · United States v. Yancey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ral findings and reasons for revocation as stated by the trial court from the bench at the conclusion of a revocation hearing satisfy a probationer’s due pro-' cess rights, presuming the findings and reasons support the revocation, when they are preserved by a reliable means sufficiently complete to allow the parties and reviewing courts to determine the facts relied on and the reasons for revoking probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he trial court made an oral statement from the bench at the conclusion of the revocation hearing that provided the reason and findings for revoking probation. At the hearing, the Commonwealth presented evidence and testimony that Appellee absconded from probation supervision and Appellee pre sented no countervailing evidence.... Thus, the recording of the probation revocation hearing in this matter provides an adequate record of the reasons for revocation and the evidence in support thereof. Further, the reasons given by the trial court to support the revocation order provide sufficient grounds to revoke Appellee’s probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.