Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

307 Ark. 120

Fry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1991

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1991-10-28

Relies on Rogers v. State

Decided 1991-10-28

Per Curiam.

¶1Bennie L. Fry, Jr., by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

¶2The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellee.

¶3 However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979). If the attorney for Fry will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

/307/ark/120 · .json · Public domain