In Re Lundahl’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Neshewat v. Hagstrom · Frieouf v. United States · Flygare v. Boulden · Ellis v. Consolidated Diesel Electric Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Legislative history and case law amply support the proposition that individuals on welfare, social security, fixed pension income, or who live on investment incomes may qualify for Chapter 13.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Sherman“The Bankruptcy Code mandates the finding of feasibility in 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (a)(6).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Sherman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.