In Re Rayborn’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Pratt · Ganey v. North Carolina · Byrd v. Alton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These courts generally say that if the motion is filed within ten days, the motion should be governed by Bankruptcy Rule 9023 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. See, e.g., Jones, 2000 WL 33673759 , at , n. 1 (citing cases). Other courts hold that where the motion is file outside of ten days, Bankruptcy Rule 9024 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) should govern what is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]ithout relying solely upon the timing of the motion for reconsideration . . . have debated whether the `for cause' standard under § 502(j) is different from the `excusable neglect' standard of Rule 60(b)(1) and have reached differing conclusions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Jones. 2000 WL 33673759 , at . Some courts look to when the motion to reconsider was filed in order to determine what standards to use to determine”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.