Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 F.2d 787 - Ferguson v. United States

Ferguson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

307 F.2d 787 · 1962

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
July 1981
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 1981 · most notably Carbo v. United States (1963), United States v. McGuire (1967)

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

370196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 47 U.S.C. § 152 · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Olmstead v. United States · Goldman v. United States · On Lee v. United States · Rathbun v. United States · Weiss v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Both Congress and the Oklahoma legislature have indicated what those respective bodies consider necessary for the control of telephonic communications. Such legislation need not be in harmony, and may conflict * * but the course of a federal criminal prosecution cannot be controlled by state law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * a regulation or order directed to the carriers over whom the Federal Communications Commission has jurisdiction, 47 U.S.C.A. § 152 , cannot be viewed as creating a new crime prohibited to the citizenry nor as changing the rules of evidence evolved in the federal courts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.