Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 F.3d 1 - Burrell v. Hampshire County

Burrell v. Hampshire County’s Empirical Analysis

307 F.3d 1 · 2002

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
3
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 75 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Surprenant v. Rivas (2005), Ruiz-Rosa v. Rullán (2007)

16 federal appellate · 75 district · 3 state decisions

520200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Farmer v. Brennan · Bell v. Wolfish · City of Canton v. Harris · Kentucky v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the standard for determining criminal recklessness.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “First, the deprivation alleged must be, objectively, sufficiently serious.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Prison officials cannot be indifferent, of course, if they are unaware of the risk. But even if they are aware, they cannot be deliberately indifferent if they responded reasonably to the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not avoided. Conceivably, a response that was color-able and taken in good faith might still be enough to negate deliberate indifference even if it were inadequate from an objective standpoint (and thus negligent).”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.