United States v. Kone’s Empirical Analysis
307 F.3d 430 · 2002
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Davis v. Alaska · Arizona v. Fulminante · United States v. Gaudin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To admit statements of a co-conspirator under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), a trial court must find that: (1) the conspiracy existed; (2) the defendant was a member of the conspiracy; and (3) the co-conspirator made the proffered statements in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his is not the case of a judge who completely abdicated his judicial responsibilities, as in Mortimer, but rather the case of a judge who presided telephonically at important stages of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] trial consists of a contest between litigants before a judge. When the judge is absent at a `critical stage' the forum is destroyed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.