Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 F.3d 460 - Hoover v. Radabaugh

Hoover v. Radabaugh’s Empirical Analysis

307 F.3d 460 · 2002

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission (2006), Farhat v. Jopke (2004)

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

340200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the defendants' intent is at issue, 'summary judgment is particularly inappropriate.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “may be appealed as [a] collateral order[] where (1) the defendant is a public official asserting the defense of qualified immunity, and (2) the issue appealed concerns not which facts the parties might be able to prove, but whether certain alleged facts reflect a violation of clearly established law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.