White v. Luebbers’s Empirical Analysis
307 F.3d 722 · 2002
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Liteky et al United States · Bell Warden v. Cone · Mickens v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have spared the defendant the need of showing probable effect upon the outcome, and have simply presumed such effect, where assistance of counsel has been denied entirely or during a critical stage of the proceeding. When that has occurred, the likelihood that the verdict is unreliable is so high that a case-by-case inquiry is unnecessary. But only in “circumstances of that magnitude” do we forgo individual inquiry into whether counsel’s inadequate performance undermined the reliability of the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ward v. Norris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.