Pavao v. Pagay’s Empirical Analysis
307 F.3d 915 · 2002
Citation profile
65 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. (2009), Harper v. City of Los Angeles (2008)
65 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Garcia · United States v. Shaibu · United States v. Griffin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A jury's verdict must be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence, which is evidence adequate to support the jury's conclusion, even if it is also possible to draw a contrary conclusion.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, permits only one reasonable conclusion, and that conclusion is contrary to the jury's verdict.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“motion for judgment as a matter of law. A renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law may be made only if there was a prior motion for judgment as a matter of law. FED R. CIV. P. 50(b). Because there was no prior motion on her due process claim, the district court properly denied her”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.