Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 FAPPX 349 - Luisa E. Silva v. Grant Miller

Luisa E. Silva v. Grant Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216

Relies on Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States ex rel. U. S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Wage & Hour Division · United Slate Tile and Composition Roofers Damp and Waterproof Workers Association Local v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company Inc · Skidmore v. John J. Casale, Inc. · Maddrix v. Dize · 276 F. Supp. 2d 1211 - MacKenzie v. Kindred Hospitals East, L.L.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On its face, Lynn's Food suggests no exception to judicial oversight of settlements when the employee receives all wages due; it offers no support for the even broader exception proposed by [the plaintiffs attorney] that would include all counseled settlements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “review . . . the reasonableness of counsel's legal fees to assure both that counsel is compensated adequately and that no conflict of interest taints the amount the wronged employee recovers under a settlement agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “shall, in addition to any judgment awarded to the plaintiff ... allow a reasonable attorney's fee to be paid by the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.