Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 FSUPP 1166 - Herrell v. Pimsler

Herrell v. Pimsler’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2011

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

60196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Harrison Richardson v. Thomas E. Gregory · Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. · Rudes v. Gottschalk · Sobel v. Diatz · 63 Cal. 2d 727 - Prichard v. Veterans Cab Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the practical impossibility of setting down a strict standard of care for minors of varying age, judgment, and intelligence,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the well established principle that a jury should decide the capabilities of the minor from the evidence in the case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.