Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 FSUPP 144 - Arant v. Stover

Arant v. Stover’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
February 2005
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2005

2019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1359

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co. · Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co. · Williamson v. Gilmer · McSparran v. Weist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Injury is defined as: Damage or hurt to or suffered by a person or thing, detriment to, or violation of, person, character, feelings, rights, property, or interests, or the value of a thing. A synonym for injury is ‘loss.’ At law, the injury here may be classified as a civil injury, defined: (Civil injury) ‘Injuries to j)erson or property resulting from a breach of contract, delict, or criminal offense, which may be redressed by a civil action. It follows that when injury produces a loss, whether that loss is expressed by payment or obligation for payment redress for such injury (loss) survives under the South Carolina Statute and the cause of action is assignable.” Arant, at p. 148 (emphasis ours)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The conclusion is that the Fourth Circuit now frowns on the forum shopping practiced by invoking federal jurisdiction through artificial or collusive means. Whether the brows of that mighty court will, at some latter date, be furrowed by concern over forum avoidance by the same practices this court does not predict." (Italics added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.