Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 Kan. 500 - State v. DeAnda

State v. DeAnda’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alleyne v. United States · State v. Ward · Alleyne v. United States · State v. Edgar · State v. Soto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(d)(1) A plea of guilty or nolo contendere, for good cause shown and within the discretion of the court, may be withdrawn at any time before sentence is adjudged."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Judicial discretion is abused if judicial action (1) is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, i.e., if no reasonable person would have taken the view adopted by the trial court; (2) is based on an error of law, i.e., if the discretion is guided by an erroneous legal conclusion; or (3) is based on an error of fact, i.e., if substantial competent evidence does not support a factual finding on which a prerequisite conclusion of law or the exercise of discretion is based." State v. Ward , 292 Kan. 541 , Syl. ¶ 3, 256 P.3d 801 (2011).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.