Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 Kan. 565 - State v. Sturgis

State v. Sturgis’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 195 L. Ed. 2d 604 - Mathis v. United States · State v. Elnicki · State v. Keel · State v. Dickey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] prosecutor commits error by misstating the evidence, even when the misstatement is accidental or inadvertent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must accurately reflect the evidence, accurately state the law, and cannot be 'intended to inflame the passions or prejudices of the jury or to divert the jury from its duty to decide the case based on the evidence and the controlling law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.