Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 Kan. 599 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 195 L. Ed. 2d 604 - Mathis v. United States · State v. Keel · State v. Dickey · State v. Wetrich · State v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'intent to commit a felony, theft or sexual battery therein.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “). Saucedo's residential burglary conviction in Washington is not comparable to the Kansas person crime of burglary of a dwelling. The State has not shown any other person offense under the Kansas criminal code that is comparable to the Washington conviction. Therefore, his prior residential burglary must be scored as a nonperson felony under K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 21-6811(e)(3) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If a person can commit burglary in another state, e.g., Missouri or Oregon, by committing acts or possessing a mental state that would not even constitute the crime of burglary in Kansas (much less a person burglary), it is counterintuitive to declare that the offenses are comparable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.