Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 Kan. 609 - State v. Warren

State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alleyne v. United States · Alleyne v. United States · State v. Soto · State v. Morningstar · State v. Guder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “were regarded as a singular entity that could not be subdivided into correct and incorrect counts. So remand for resentencing on one count allowed all counts to be resentenced as the courts saw fit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]arring the need to alter a nonvacated sentence as a matter of law, the district court may only modify the vacated sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “nothing in the statutory scheme allows resentencing on other 11 convictions following the vacating of a sentence on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.