Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 Kan. 648 - State v. Arnett

State v. Arnett’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

76 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · 134 S. Ct. 1710 - Paroline v. United States · Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co. · McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A. · State v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to canons of statutory construction, consult legislative history, or consider other background information to ascertain the statute's meaning.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the language of the statute is unclear or ambiguous,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “causal link between a defendant's crime and the restitution damages for which the defendant is held liable must satisfy the traditional elements of proximate cause: cause-in-fact and legal causation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.