Wiedeman v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2011
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunter v. Keightley · Lichtenthaler v. Clow · Wigginton v. Holbrook · Patton v. Schneider
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled in this state that a vendee of land may recover for a shortage in acreage regardless of whether the sale is in gross or by the acre, if the deficiency equals or is in excess of 10 per cent of the quantity purportedly sold. See Hunter v. Keightley et al., 184 Ky. 835 , 213 S.W. 201 , and Wigginton v. Holbrook, 193 Ky. 805 , 237 S.W. 1063 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wallace v. Cummins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.