Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 MASS 96 - Schillander v. Schillander

Schillander v. Schillander’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
6
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably Knox v. Remick (1976), Freeman v. Sieve (1949)

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 39 state decisions

1301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on French v. McAnarney · Wilson v. Caswell · Bailey v. Dillon · Gediman v. Cameron · Bradford v. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Its terms show that the parties intended that it should continue in effect after a decree of divorce, (cite omitted) The decree does not mention alimony or incorporate the agreement and so could not have been accepted as a substitute for the husband’s contractual obligation. (cite omitted) The agreement remains valid and may still be enforced by action at law after the decree.” Id. at 98 , 29 N.E.2d at 687 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The essence of his petition and of his argument before us is that he should be relieved from full performance of a binding contract to which he is a party and which he now finds burdensome, and that the court should substitute for it some less onerous obligation. . . . [Id. at 687-688.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.