Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 Mo. 682 - Keener v. Williams

Keener v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
June 1963
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 1963

21 state decisions

9019251930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Creamer v. Bivert · Darrier v. Darrier · Bobb v. Bobb · Sell v. West · Crenshaw v. Crenshaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The suit was tried as one in equity before the court nisi. While this court has said that the whole record must come here for review in. equity cases so that we may weigh and decide the same de novo, nevertheless where an issue of fact rests on the credibility of the witnesses, this court will usually defer to the finding of the chancellor who has many opportunities, necessarily denied to us, of seeing and hearing the witnesses themselves, observing their demeanor while testifying, and of determining the weight which properly attaches to their testimony. [Creamer v. Bivert, 214 Mo. 473 .] ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.