Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 N.C. 130 - State v. Chamberlain

State v. Chamberlain’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably State v. Eason (1991), State v. Fernandez (1997)

66 state decisions

2901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Hankerson v. North Carolina · Moore v. United States · State v. Goodman · State v. Hankerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Following a hearing on a motion to suppress, it is incumbent on the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. State v. Jackson, 292 N.C. 203 , 232 S.E. 2d 407 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 850 (1977). The court’s findings, if supported by competent evidence, are conclusive on appeal. State v. Herndon, 292 N.C. 424 , 233 S.E. 2d 557 (1977). If there is a conflict between the state’s evidence and defendant’s evidence on material facts, it is the duty of the trial court to resolve the conflict and such resolution will not be disturbed on appeal. Id. If all the evidence tends to show that investigators made promises or threats to a suspect whose confession is the product of hope or fear generated by such promises or threats, the confession will be ruled involuntary as a matter of law. State v. Pruitt, 286 N.C. 442, 455-58 , 212 S.E. 2d 92, 100-02 (1975), and cases there cited.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.