Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 N.C. 169 - State v. Corbett

State v. Corbett’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably State v. Morgan (1986), State v. Wilson (1985)

83 state decisions

5301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · State v. Smith · State v. Powell · Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe · State v. Barfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “though not necessary by virtue of G.S. § 15-155, is nevertheless mandated by G.S. § 15-144.1(a). We do not read this statute as either requiring the averment or as expressing a legislative intent that the language in G.S. § 15-144.1(a) prevail over the express language in G.S. § 15-155 which states in effect that no judgment shall be stayed or reversed because of the omission of the words”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t may have been the better form to have added to the bill that the alleged default was also 'contrary to the statute in such case made and provided,' but this, if it be a defect, is one cured in express terms by our Statute of Jeofails”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “No judgment upon any indictment for felony or misdemeanor, whether after verdict, or by confession, or otherwise, shall be stayed or reversed for ... omission of the words ... `with force and arms,'....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.