Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 N.C. 321 - State v. Alston

State v. Alston’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

244
cited by 244 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

244 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 244 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Braswell (1985), State v. Holden (1987)

244 state decisions

7401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Fahy v. Connecticut · Moore v. Illinois · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 244 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the appellant's duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant is prejudiced by errors . . . when there is a reasonable possibility that, had the error in question not been committed, a different result would have been reached at the trial out of which the appeal arises. The burden of showing such prejudice under this subsection is upon the defendant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) Order the party to permit the discovery or inspection, or (2) Grant a continuance or recess, or (3) Prohibit the party from introducing evidence not disclosed, or (3a) Declare a mistrial, or (3b) Dismiss the charge, with or without prejudice, or (4) Enter other appropriate orders.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.