Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 N.C. 655 - State v. Odom

State v. Odom’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

1,460
cited by 1,460 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1,454 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,460 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Lawrence (2012), Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co. (2008)

2 federal appellate · 1,454 state decisions

50901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Henderson v. Kibbe · Guzman v. United States · United States v. McCaskill · State v. Marshall Norman Hicks · State v. Weaver

Cited together with United States v. McCaskill · State v. Walker · Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. International City Bank & Trust Co. · State v. Lawrence · State v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,460 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings”
    247 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In deciding whether a defect in the jury instruction constitutes `plain error,' the appellate court must examine the entire record and determine if the instructional error had a probable impact on the jury's finding of guilt.”
    50 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A party may not assign as error any portion of the jury charge or omission therefrom unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly that to which he objects and the grounds of his objection; provided, that opportunity was given to the party to make the objection out of the hear ing of the jury, and, on request of any party, out of the presence of the jury.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.