B.D. v. Carley’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 43 Cal. 3d 833 - Vinson v. Superior Court · 16 Cal. 3d 905 - Edwards v. Superior Court · Jakubowski v. Lengen · 8 Ariz. App. 332 - Pedro v. Glenn · 281 N.J. Super. 605 - Stoughton v. BPOE NO. 2151
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defense psychologist does not have the right to dictate the terms under which the examination shall be held. This is a discovery psychological examination, not one in which plaintiff is being treated. Plaintiff's right to preserve evidence of the nature of the examination, the accuracy of the examiner's notes or recollections, the tones of voice and the like outweigh the examiner's preference that there be no recording device. [ Ibid. ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Insofar as Stoughton v. B.P.O.E. No. 2151 , ... generally limits without special reasons, the presence of counsel or a representative at physical examinations (other than psychological or psychiatric examinations) and also limits the use of recording devices at psychiatric or psychological examinations, the opinion shall be deemed overruled. [ Ibid. ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that in a psychological or psychiatric examination the presence of counsel could be distracting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.