Ulmer v. O'MALLEY’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis. · Howells v. McKibben
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The child was conceived in South Dakota and the mother moved to this state when she was approximately 7 months pregnant. Defendant neither visited nor called her here. * * * Thus, Howells does not persuasively support, let alone require, that jurisdiction be exercised on these facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the quantity of the defendant’s contacts with the state; (2) the nature and quality of the contacts; (3) the connection of the cause of action with those contacts; (4) the interest of the state in providing a forum; and (5) convenience to the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hartling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.