June v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1997
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is not this court's function to substitute a ballot title of its own choosing for that provided by the Attorney General unless we can say affirmatively that the ballot title provided by the Attorney General `does not substantially comply with the requirements of ORS 250.035 * * *.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mabon v. Kulongoski“"[t]he court shall review the title for substantial compliance with the requirements of ORS 250.035, and shall certify a title meeting this standard to the Secretary of State." (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mabon v. Kulongoski“[a] concise and impartial statement of not more than 85 words summarizing the measure and its major effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mabon v. Kulongoski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.