Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 P2D 878 - Harless v. State

Harless v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1963
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coker v. Vierson · 20 Okla. Crim. 57 - Talliaferro v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the provisions of sections 5246 and 5247, Rev.Laws 1910 [12 O.S.1951 § 962, as amended Laws 1955, p. 140 § 1, and § 963], in case of accident or misfortune which could not have been reasonably avoided by the party appealing, the appellate court may, upon a proper showing, make an order fixing the time for making and serving a case, or filing the same in the appellate court, beyond the time allowed by statute, but not beyond the time within which an appeal may be commenced in the appellate court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.