307 So. 2d 235 - Summers v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Finally, appellants' reliance upon § 627.727(1), F.S. 1971, to the effect that the coverage provided under that section shall be excess over but shall not duplicate other benefits such as any automobile liability coverage is misplaced. We construe that provision to mean that an injured party's uninsured motorist coverage is to be excess over but shall not duplicate the injured party's personal injury protection benefits, medical payments, etc., contained in said party's policy. But in all events such excess coverage provision only comes into play when the tortfeasor is driving an uninsured motor vehicle. The tortfeasor here was driving a motor vehicle which at the time of the collision was an insured motor vehicle."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 320 So. 2d 38 - American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Dawson

2. “The coverage provided under this section shall be excess over but shall not duplicate the benefits available to an insured ... under any ... automobile liability ... coverages ...”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 320 So. 2d 38 - American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Dawson