Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 So. 2d 317 - State v. Mora

307 So. 2d 317 - State v. Mora’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2016 · most notably New Jersey v. T. L. O. (1985), Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District (1982)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

14019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the officers had probable cause to search the trunk for marijuana. Warrantless Search The closer issue presented is whether a search warrant was required either at the time of the initial search of the passenger compartment or at the time of the search at the police station. It is clear that under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as Louisiana Constitution Article I § 5, a warrantless search is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “" . . . Because of the function of these school officials and their strict accountability to the State, we must conclude that these school officials, insofar as they are discharging their duties by enforcing State policies and regulations, are within the purview of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition; therefore, their students must be accorded their constitutional right to be free from warrantless searches and seizures."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.