State v. Landrum’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2015
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Maroney · State v. Stokes · State v. Crockett · State v. Landry · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as to whether the defendant was charged as a principal or an accessory to the crime. Defendant urges that the ends of justice would be served by a new trial. La.C.Cr.P. art. 851(5). Defendant's allegation that the jury was confused as to the charges leveled against the defendant is based on the following circumstances: The jury, after having retired to consider its verdict, returned to the courtroom with a question. This exchange took place:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“And we are not prepared to say that prejudice is presumed where counsel alleges he was unprepared to go to trial (even if we assume that this is true) in a case such as the present where counsel was appointed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.