Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

307 S.W.3d 189

Toth v. Toth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 2010

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2010-03-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2011

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-03-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Dina Toth appeals from the trial court’s grant of Joseph (“Joe”) Toth’s motion for summary judgment on her second amended petition for damages.

¶3 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/307/sw3d/189 · .json · Public domain