Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

307 S.W.3d 193

Gray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 2010

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2010-03-23

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2014

8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-03-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Anthony Lamar Gray appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/307/sw3d/193 · .json · Public domain