Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 SW3D 437 - Dewalt v. State

Dewalt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 207th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Crane v. Kentucky · Hooper v. State · Richardson v. Green · Laster v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Venue statutes function to ensure that jurors have a natural interest in the case because it touched their community; to ensure that prosecutions are initiated in counties that have some factual connection to the case, thus minimizing inconvenience to parties and witnesses; to aid predictability in judicial caseloads, and to prevent forum-shopping by the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.