Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 SW3D 640 - State v. Severe

State v. Severe’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Burks v. United States · Lockhart v. Nelson · Bifulco v. United States · State v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any issue that was not preserved can only be reviewed for plain error, which requires a finding that manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice has resulted from the trial court error.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]oth statutes contain identical language that requires presentation of such evidence prior to the case's submission to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “clear words of the statute govern interpretation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.