Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 307 U.S. 325 - Perkins v. Elg

Perkins v. Elg’s Empirical Analysis

307 U.S. 325 · 1939

Citation profile

636
cited by 636 later decisions
78
cited 78 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

284 federal appellate · 116 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 636 later decisions (78 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2021 · most notably Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. (1949), Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951)

284 federal appellate · 116 district · 13 state decisions

31701939194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · United States v. Wong Kim Ark · Krueger v. United States · Terlinden v. Ames

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 636 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * any American citizen shall be deemed to have expatriated himself * * * when he has taken an oath of allegiance to any foreign state.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is entitled to all the rights and privileges of [U.S.] citizenship.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.