Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 Ark. 114 - Lee v. McNeil

Lee v. McNeil’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Arn · United States v. Hudson · McKenzie v. Burris · State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners · State v. Morrill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The circuit judges and chancery judges subject to this subsection [Sixth District] may by agreement, hold either of the circuit or chancery courts and may hear and try matters pending in any of those courts or may hear or try matters in the same court at the same time. The judges subject to this subsection may adopt such rules as they deem appropriate for the assignment of cases in the circuit and chancery courts of their district.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.