Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 ARK 289 - State v. Kerfoot

State v. Kerfoot’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kline v. Kline · Todd v. Pochop · Scinta v. Markward · Iowa ex rel. Iowa Department of Social Services v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The very purpose of the URESA requires that it be procedurally and substantively streamlined. Interstate enforcement of support obligations will be impaired if matters of custody, visitation, or a custodial parent’s contempt are considered by the responding court. The introduction of such collateral issues will burden the URESA mechanism. Moreover, permitting the resolution of other family matters in a URESA petition proceeding may deter persons from invoking the URESA.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.