Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 ARK 603 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2012

18 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marx v. State · Combs v. State · McDaniel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “called the appellant's motions `ridiculous' and `bureaucratic nonsense'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.