Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 F.3d 124 - Berthoff v. United States

Berthoff v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

308 F.3d 124 · 2002

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
September 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 20 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Bousley v. United States · Reed v. Ross

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.