Haase v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 1997 · most notably Marshall v. Snyder (1978), 799 F. Supp. 467 - Bowen Engineering v. Estate of Reeve (1992)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on General Protective Committee v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. · Conrad v. Diehl. · Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc. · Mintzer v. Arthur L. Wright & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that [where] there probably has been fraudulent conduct, and there is imminent danger of the property being concealed, lost or diminished in value, legal remedies are not adequate, and the harm to the movant by denial would be greater than that to the opposing parties on appointment, the appointment should be granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The appointment of a receiver pendente lite will not foreclose [the assignee’s] interest, if any, in the bearer note. Adequate process will be issued to permit him and all others to assert their views. The receivership will only preserve the property pending the outcome of the suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“bears two well-defined badges of fraud: transfer pending the writ of execution and transfer to a relative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.