Van Cleef & Arpels, Inc. v. Schechter’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2015
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Relies on Braunfeld v. Gibbons · Brattleboro Publishing Co. v. Winmill Publishing Corp. · Nutt v. National Institute Incorporated for the Improvement of Memory · Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co. · Gerlach-Barklow Co. v. Morris & Bendien, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he current catalog of copyright entries and the index volumes herein provided for shall be admitted in any court as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein as regards any copyright registration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.