Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 FSUPP2D 1 - Universal Studios LLLP v. Peters

Universal Studios LLLP v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 111 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 119 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Office has decided to accept all properly addressed claims with only a business meter postmark if they were actually in the Copyright Office on August 1, 1995, since the Office has an absolute assurance that these claims must have been deposited with the U.S. Postal Service during the month of July in order to reach the Office by August 1, 1995. The Office, however, will not accept any properly addressed claim with only a July business meter postmark which arrives in the Office on August 2, 1995, or later, because the absolute assurance of a July mailing with the U.S. Postal Service does not apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “provides a bright line test which should end all questions of fact regarding the timeliness of the claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in accordance with requirements that the Librarian of Congress shall prescribe by regulation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.