Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 Ky. 67 - Deckert v. Levy

Deckert v. Levy’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 1986

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

5019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves · Keller v. Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board · Board of Trustees v. Scott · Slaughter v. Post · Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Klein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But, as we have said, the Board has not established or promulgated any such regulation for the City of Newport. And the City has not chosen to exercise its option to create the office of City Alcoholic Beverage Administrator, (emphasis added). Id. at 434.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is going too far to say that such an administrative board ... may act in contravention of local legislation, without having laid down any standard, established any rule or adopted any stable regulation.” Id. 213 S.W.2d at 433 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not inconsistent with the law, as are expedient in maintaining the peace, good government, health and welfare of the city.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.