Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 NJSUPER 225 - Karam v. State

Karam v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably In Re Water Use Permit Applications (2000), 340 N.J. Super. 511 - Mt. Olive Complex v. TWP. OF MT. OLIVE (2001)

30 state decisions

200199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon · Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council · Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. · Agins v. City of Tiburon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any loss that may have been suffered is damnum absque injuria "). Although changes in access may result in an owner suffering some diminution of property value, regulation under the police power "secures an `average reciprocity of advantage' to everyone concerned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has been unable to develop any `set formula' for determining when `justice and fairness' require that economic injuries caused by public action be compensated by the government, rather than remain disproportionately concentrated on a few persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is thus plain that the 1924 riparian grant from the State to the Schweinerts [the predecessors-in-title] did not create an absolute and perpetual right to construct a dock, free from all legislative and regulatory intervention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.